Unless you’ve been under a political rock, you’ve likely heard there is a special election for the 26th District in the Minnesota Senate. Yes indeed, now former Sen. Dick Day resigned to lobby for Racinos, a topic long near and dear to his heart.
I spent this past Sunday doing some doorknocking for Faribault school board member and St. Olaf atomic physics professor Jason Engbrecht (DFL), and the reception was terrific. I’m confident Jason’s tremendous knowledge of education finance and his innovative ideas for job creation will see him to victory, but that’s not why I’m writing this post.
There are two other candidates though, and all three debated last night in Faribault. Republican candidate Mike Parry’s “misguided” postings on Twitter have been widely reported, but the Independence Party candidate and Waseca Mayor Roy Srp said something last night that bothered me.
At 9:53 of this video from the Fairbault Daily News, the question about Racinos popped up, and Srp said “I want you to know, people are afraid to talk about this. What goes on with the tribal gaming in the State of Minnesota is absolutely a crime!” What Srp references is the share of revenue the State of Minnesota gets from tribal casinos, which amounts to a just a few thousand dollars to the Department of Public Safety, mostly for inspection of the slot/poker machines.
But Roy, this isn’t a crime. In fact, the State of Minnesota negotiated and signed compacts with the tribes as authorized by Congress starting in 1989. Srp should feel free to take issue with those who negotiated these compacts on behalf of the state, but to use loaded words like “crime” to describe the actions of Native Americans in carrying-out their part of legal compacts is simply irresponsible. Srp continued by saying that he looks forward to Dick Day’s advocacy of the Racino in order for the state to gain leverage to get more money from the tribes.
Even Sen. Day himself explained on Paul Allen’s KFAN show on Dec. 20 that his efforts are not a result of disdain toward the tribes, as such he went no where near making criminal accusations. Rather, it was Gov. Tim Pawlenty in 2004 who tried to take tribal gaming revenue hostage by suggesting that “other gambling options” would be explored if the tribes refused to play ball with him by renegotiating the compacts. The tribes, as expected, flat out refused. I can’t imagine this would change much in 2010.
Let me explain further: I like spending time at Canterbury Park. There are few things I enjoy more during a nice summer day than walking around the facility, checking out the horses, making a small wager, and plopping myself close to the rail to watch an exciting race. Occasionally, I will pull up a chair at a card table. Heck, I’ve even ran into and chatted with Sen. Day one evening over by the winner’s circle. Day, Canterbury, horsemen, and other Racino allies make very fair points to advocate their proposal, and reasonable people can debate its pros and cons.
Personally, I question whether this is the most responsible way to fund ongoing governmental expenditures, even during a budget crisis. I also question whether this proposal satisfies the constitutional requirements in regard to the environmental trust fund. It’s questions such as these which should be the focus of debate about Racino or other gaming proposals, not ones which seek to stigmatize Native Americans. While no one can question the financial success some tribes have had as a direct result of these compacts, a legislative candidate such as Srp throwing around rhetoric suggesting they are criminals (especially when, ahem, it was their land which was taken from them) should not be taken lightly. If Srp didn’t intend to make this charge, he should be more careful with his language in public forums. This isn’t a matter, as Mike Parry would probably suggest, of political correctness, either. This is a matter both of law and responsible discourse.
Note: some information cited was obtained from this excellent House Research report (99 page PDF).

