IE does NOT display this site and right sidebar correctly! It is highly recommended you install Firefox to view this site in its full glory. It is also much safer with less risk of viruses and spyware which IE is susceptible to.

Coleman stiffs Farmers Union to attend fundraiser…across the hall?

November 20th, 2007 4:13 pm by DJ Danielson

We’re back here catching up following a long weekend/start to the week.

Friday Jason and I had the privilege of attending the reception for the Minnesota Farmers Union annual convention in Minneapolis. While there were certainly some people who asked “What’s that mean?” when we told them we were bloggers, there was also a tremendous amount of interest from the people with whom we spoke in using this medium to connect rural Minnesota.

As far as the political discussion went, the theme throughout our stay was the sheer frustration people have with the Republican’s obstructionism relating to moving the Farm Bill forward in the U.S. Senate.

Other, prior obligations kept Jason and I from sticking around for Saturday’s festivities which appeared to include most of the weekend’s fun.

Setting aside who actually spoke to the convention, elected officials such as Rep. Tim Walz and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (each a member of his/her respective chamber’s Agriculture Committee), and candidates such as Al Franken and Mike Ciresi, the day seems to be more notable for who didn’t speak: Sen. Norm Coleman, who serves with Klobuchar on the Senate’s ag. committee.

(A) Bluestem Prairie reports that while Coleman’s people snubbed the MFU, despite repeated calls, emails and faxes, his people picked the same freakin’ hotel, the Four Points Sheraton, for a fundraiser at the same time with some dentists.

Others may see this as more of an issue of Coleman snubbing a major constituency. I see it as more of an issue of blatant “WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?!” on the part of the individual(s) responsible for scheduling this event and not making sure Coleman was scheduled to speak in front of those farmers.

Sure, the dental people may have scheduled the event at the Sheraton over the heads of the Coleman campaign. That would simply be a gaffe.

For Coleman’s campaign scheduler to not partition 10-15 minutes to talk to the MFU considering he would be within a few measly feet of the convention? That is pure incompetence.

Almanac: Walz v. Kline Round II

November 16th, 2007 1:16 am by DJ Danielson

Over two months after Minnesota Reps. Tim Walz and John Kline .ast squared off on the big blue couch on Twin Cities Public Television’s Friday night staple Almanac (that time about the Iraq war) the two will return to the program to discuss this week’s House vote to approve transportation and housing funding. Included in the bill was funding for the reconstruction of the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis, the Northstar commuter rail corridor and funding for US Highway 14 in southern Minnesota, which is, well, in craptastic shape.

Walz voted for the bill; Kline voted against it.

From the Almanac Producer’s blog:

Congressional Tussle Over Funding the New 35W Bridge
U.S. House members John Kline and Tim Walz took different sides on a big House Bill that would fund –among other things– the final construction costs of the new 35W Bridge in Minneapolis. They join us live to explain their positions.

7:00 p.m. on KTCA 2.

Sarvi: Kline’s grandstanding on transportation is shocking

November 14th, 2007 9:28 pm by DJ Danielson

The US House of Representatives today approved a transportation and housing bill today by a vote of 270-147.  The only members of the Minnesota delegation voting against the bill were Reps. John Kline and Michele Bachmann, both Republicans.  The bill includes $195 million for funding the reconstruction of the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis.

Steve Sarvi, the only announced DFL challenger to Kline so far, released the following statement:

“I’m in shock. John Kline has been grandstanding on this issue for the past month – and now, when he actually has the opportunity to deliver the funds authorized to Minnesota in the wake of the bridge tragedy, he votes against the bill. He chose a smoke-and-mirrors attempt at convincing his constituents he’s willing to invest in the infrastructure they count on every day over actually doing anything about it. This was a horrible vote for the people of Minnesota. An unthinkable vote.”

President Bush has threatened a veto based on grounds it “doesn’t hold spending to reasonable and responsible levels.”  It’s too bad that Kline and Bachmann are more concerned with helping Bush reinvent himself as a fiscal conservative with a year remaining in his term than investing in infrastructure.

Want to talk about playing politics with the bridge?  Kline, Bachmann and Bush offer the prime example of that with their votes and threatened veto, respectively.

Beef gassed with carbon monoxide investigated in Congress

November 14th, 2007 8:40 pm by DJ Danielson

It appears pre-cut/pre-packaged meat is under fire for its use of carbon monoxide to maintain redness in Congress.

While preserving sales along with the meat’s bright pink hue, the practice is coming under fire from a rival business and consumer groups.

The CEOs of Hormel and Cargill, who testified in Congress on Tuesday, say there’s no public health risk, a conclusion which gets significant backing from the scientific community and the government, which has approved the practice.

But in political terms, this is a battle between industry rivals that have each recruited their state’s congressional delegation to help advance their cause.

On one side are Hormel and Cargill, who have turned to Minnesota Democrats Collin Peterson, the chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, and Tim Walz, whose district includes Hormel’s Austin, Minn., headquarters.

On the other side are Reps. John Dingell and Bart Stupak, both Democrats from Michigan, the home base of Kalsec Foods, a rival company that is marketing a patented rosemary extract that keeps red meat from turning brown on the grocery store shelf.

If only it were as simple of an issue as “carnivores want their steak bloody red!!!”

Of course the manufacturer can package the precut meat in an oxygen proof tray but then the meat wouldn’t turn red until after opening, and really, who wants to buy dark meat?

It isn’t just about redness, though.  It’s about screwing blue collar workers out of good jobs at the retail level and reducing cost by cutting, trimming, traying, wrapping, weighing and pricing at the processing plant.

In the effort to squeeze every last penny out of expenses, retailers (starting with Wal-Mart all the way down) have decided that customer service isn’t important in the meat department and that the manufacturer knows best which thickness of steak a customer should have, not the customer him or herself.

I’ve worked in retail meat departments, so I know a thing or two about this subject (I know everything, too, but that’s irrelevant). Do I think legislation banning CO in meat should be in order? Probably not, but there probably should be stricter legislation on shelf life.  As an alternative to legislation, if American consumers don’t want meat products packaged in carbon monoxide they should tell the major retailers that by supporting smaller meat markets and grocery stores that still cut steaks and roasts fresh off the primal in the store.

If consumers are  satisfied with mediocrity, why should the retailer provide anything more? There may be a premium at the checkout for a while, but if the larger supermarkets are throwing away more of the prepackaged crap than they are selling, they will be forced to return to selling fresh meat cut on-site.  Of course, as the Wege noted Saturday, even service counters have to produce quality fresh looking products.

Of course then Wal-Mart might be forced to hire meat cutters again (risking unionization, history lesson here) or simply getting the hell out of the fresh grocery business.  Neither possibility would be bad.

Ollie Ox has declared she shuns pre-packed meat already.  Since her name indicates she is a heifer, I find it a bit of a conflict of interest that she is tying to blog about beef issues.

Regardless, when she speaks about liquid being pumped into to meat, that happens with just about all Hormel pork, prepackaged or not.  Advertised as a “solution to add tenderness and juiciness” or something similar, the sodium phosphate based solution prevents bacteria from developing which, while also increasing the saltiness on the taste buds, increases shelf life, which then increases benefit to the bottom line.

DFL Senate debate observations; DJ meets Davis?

November 14th, 2007 5:19 pm by DJ Danielson

This past Saturday, Dr. Brian Davis (GOP candidate for Congress in the First) and I met each another for the first time.

Was Davis polite and cordial?

Arrogant and standoffish?

Diplomatic but firm?

Or was he none of the above and just went ahead with his plan to destroy me by unleashing his onslaught of evil, non-Mayo approved radiology, err, radiation oncology upon my being?

Stick around to the end of the post to find out!

Senate Candidates

That same day I made the four-mile trek to Prior Lake High School, my alma mater, in my hometown of Savage to check out the festivities of the DFL State Central Committee meeting and the debate between DFL US Senate candidates hoping to take on Norm Coleman next November.

The high school, open two years following the graduation of Jason and I (I had be nostaligic and check the athletic showcases; Jason looks so manly in his football uniform!), had yet to receive a visit from me. It is quite the impressive facility with just a few hundred people present, but I’m sure with overcrowded hallways and classrooms during a school day it is less so.

As I got there well before the debate I was able to secure a front-row seat nearby the TV cameras, Mike McIntee from the Uptake and a nice fellow who introduced himself as JP, a Republican tracker.

For a play-by-play rundown of the debate, check out my liveblog post.
Two hours certainly flies by when you have four candidates answering questions, and both factors also limit the amount of questions that can be asked. The debate was good in that it offered candidates a chance to give their views on a items which have yet to receive such focus such as NASA funding and the creation of a Department of Peace. Missed were lengthy discussions on climate change (so we don’t have to hear Al Franken recite Al Gore again) and transportation (bridge collapse, etc.).

Here are my impressions of how each candidate performed and basically my thoughts of each candidate so far:

Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer: Passionate, thoughtful, and articulate. In my opinion he won the debate. Some friends of mine might be surprised I would think of a guy as far left as him perhaps the best candidate (considering I’m quite moderate), but I think he is a very qualified candidate for this position. So what if eliminating 70 percent of carbon emissions in the next ten years is close to impossible? So what if going to single-payer health care immediately is probably a proposition only from fantasy? So what if shutting down all military bases in Iraq soon probably isn’t attainable? The vision to at least try and get to those goals is what we need right now in this time of mediocrity (at best!) with Coleman.

Jim Cohen: He is a smart guy who has experience in several key areas but unfortunately doesn’t come across with any sort of “it” factor, especially when compared to the other three. Answering after Nelson-Pallmeyer may have hurt him during this debate in the following regard, but he comes across as regurgitating the same progressive viewpoints already delivered in a more passionate and thorough manner by Nelson-Pallmeyer. He spoke of needing new solutions for higher education, but had no solutions immediately available. He would be a fine candidate for the state legislature or even Congress, but just isn’t the guy right now to take on Coleman.

Al Franken: Uh oh, I better put on the protective armor before MDE pulls quotes from me. Just kidding, of course. Franken is someone who bugs me in the sense that he comes across as someone who always needs to be the “rockstar,” which is understandable considering his celebrity past but isn’t what all people want in a US Senator. Other things that bugged me about Franken during the debate: putting his hands on other candidates (just made him look controlling), tossing it to Ciresi a couple of times when it was his turn to answer (as if he was the moderator), all of the “I know so-and-so in a certain situation and I’m going to use two-and-a-half minutes telling that story and 30 seconds giving my position” stories, and his use of so many jokes. I know he’s a comedian and the use of jokes gets people to laugh and like him, but does nothing to prove to me personally that he is a the best candidate for this job. One joke that did work was was the Richard Pearle reference to point out why a cabinet level department of peace wouldn’t work, but continuing to make fun of things like George W. Bush’s public speaking ability doesn’t help him. Any College Democrat can do that; we need something more out of a US Senate candidate.

Mike Ciresi: Along with Franken, Ciresi appears quite moderate compared to Cohen and JNP and some people see these moderate stances as trying to win over Republicans; I’m not sure this is true for Ciresi. On health care, for example, Franken answered the question “What would you do to get to universal health care” by giving excuses why single-payer wouldn’t work. While not advocating for single-payer, Ciresi actually answered how universal would be paid for. I find it appealing that Ciresi, while having a tremendous resume as a trial lawyer, doesn’t feel the need to tell specific stories about his experience very often. After all, its a debate! Answer the questions and give us your positions.

Links to YouTube’s of the debate are here.

Now back to what I started the post with: Yes, as I was wrapping up shop and shutting down my computer, I was greeted by candidate for Congress in the First District, Dr. Brian Davis.

Yes, a debate in the Second district. With DFLers. Going for Senate, not the House.

Regardless of how ruthless we have been to him, he came across as a nice guy, even telling me that if it was indeed all of my own work, I did a good job with the Randy Demmer per-diem stuff.

Who else would have done the post if not me? That I don’t know. Davis gave me his business card and told me to contact him if we wanted to grant him an interview, which we may down the road.

As opposed to my four mile trek, Davis had an 81 mile trip one-way from Rochester to Savage. He must be very, very interested in the positions of the candidates for Senate from the DFL to make that trek with $3.00/gallon fuel, or maybe he was just making a pit stop before going to an old buddies house in some city like Shakopee for darts, pizza and beer?

Who knows. As long as he doesn’t tell me how to blog, I won’t tell him what to do with his Saturdays!

Rochester Post-Bulletin: Sarvi sees Walz’ footprints in race against Kline

November 14th, 2007 1:18 am by DJ Danielson

As Steve Sarvi’s campaign for Congress from Minnesota’s Second District slowly but surely picks up steam, so too does the mainstream media’s coverage.

This Ed Felker article from yesterday’s Rochester Post-Bulletin illustrates strong parallels to Tim Walz at this stage of the race, particularly, National Guard service and lack of experience in partisan office:

Sarvi, 42, hopes his own military background and local connections, combined with another strong Democratic election wave, will be his trump card against the seemingly entrenched Kline. Like Walz, Sarvi is married and has young children. Both he and Walz served in the Minnesota National Guard and worked in the public sector.

Likewise, neither Walz nor Sarvi had much political experience before declaring their bids. Sarvi wasn’t active in partisan politics previously, holding the nonpartisan posts of mayor in Watertown; city administrator and clerk in Lanesboro; and his current full-time job as city administrator of Victoria.

He acknowledged in an interview that he attended Republican caucuses around 2000, but said he was “always more of a moderate” to Republicans, and said he is now “probably a little left of center, because of some social issues.”

So far, the race has yet to attract national attention, and political observers haven’t placed the Kline-Sarvi match among races to watch.

Congressional Quarterly still lists MN-2 as “Safe Republican,” but after Walz’s win in 2006 we know that those ratings aren’t the end all be all of candidate’s fate.

Want to find out more about Sarvi? Check him out at these remaining dates and locations as part of his district-wide listening tour:

Today, 5 – 6:30 p.m. : Chanhassen, American Legion Post 580, 290 Lake Dr. E. , Chanhassen; 7 – 8 p.m. : Senate District 34 DFL, Chanhassen Library, 7711 Kerber Blvd. , Chanhassen.

Thurs., Nov. 15, 5 – 6:30 p.m.: Prior Lake , Prior Lake Public Library , 16210 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake; 7 – 8:30 p.m. : Burnsville , JoJo’s Rise & Wine, 12501 Nicollet Ave., #100 , Burnsville.

Fri., Nov. 16, 5 – 6:30 p.m. : Eagan , Community Center, 1501 Central Pkwy. , Eagan.

Sat., Nov. 17, 10:30 – noon: Northfield, Northfield Library, 210 Washington St., Northfield; 12:30 – 2 p.m. : Faribault, Java Live, 313 Central Ave N. , Faribault ; 2:30 – 4 p.m. : Montgomery, Montgomery Public Library, 104 Oak Ave. E. , Montgomery.

DFL challenger to Mark Olson announced; Pfeilsticker to take on Drazkowski again

November 13th, 2007 11:09 pm by DJ Danielson

With just under a year to go until the 2008 election, contenders for the Minnesota House of Representatives are lining up.

The Star Tribune is reporting today that DFLer Steve Andrews will challenge Rep. Mark Olson, R-Big Lake, for the District 16B seat.

That’s if Mean Mark isn’t victim to a primary before the general election.  Olson is infamous for a domestic saga culminating with his conviction for misdemeanor domestic assault this summer.  In addition to the conviction, he was suspended from the House GOP Caucus.

Following all of his troubles, I have to ask: why the hell isn’t this guy giving it up already?  Does he have the support of any Republican?

I guess he has the support of some as at least a few allowed themselves to be advertised for his old-fashioned family picnic in September.  To me, nothing screams “fun family time” like the combination of pork chops, a petting zoo, Sue Jeffers blowing smoke (figuratively or literally: not sure?) and a politician convicted of domestic meanness.

I wasn’t present, but I can just picture Phil Krinkie on hay ride duty and reacting to a youngster wanting to come along: “Why are we giving you subsidized transportation?! Have you ever thought about who is footing the bill?! When is ‘enough enough’ when it comes to transit?!”

Sounds like family fun indeed.  Also advertised for the picnic was Rep. Steve Drazkowski, R-Wabasha.

Speaking of the Draz (wow, do I have great transitions or what?!) learned (hopefully at least) that he will be facing Winona High School teacher Linda Pfeilsticker, DFL-Wabasha, in a rematch of August’s special election between the two.  Drazkowski came out ahead 53-47 for the 28B seat to replace departing former House Speaker Steve Sviggum.

MnDOT: Farked!; other woes for Molnau and company.

November 13th, 2007 1:26 pm by DJ Danielson

I admit: I’m a big fan of news-aggregator Fark.com and the awesome, albeit sometimes harsh, satirical headlines.  Last month “Farkers” had fun with the official logo of the Republican National Convention which is coming to St. Paul next year as a part of one of their frequent photoshop contests.

Yesterday, Fark linked to this column from the Rake with this heartwarming headline (tagged in the “obvious” category):

Minnesota DOT employees complain of “hostile phone conversations” with reporters covering bridge collapse. It’s getting so that states can’t kill their citizens without some civil servant being made uncomfortable by questions

It also appears Fark is coming into the mainstream somewhat: the site was featured in its own category yesterday on Jeopardy!

The termination of MnDOT’s emergency management director Sonia Pitt doesn’t seem to be even close to the end of issues for the administration of the state agency in charge of dealing with awful congestion and a bridge in the river.

Pitt’s supervision, including everything all the way up to commissioner and Lt. Gov. Carol Molnau, is being investigated as part of “standard procedure.”

Also, MnDOT is being investigated for not reaching goals to give projects to women and minority-owned businesses.  We noted during our liveblogging of September’s one day special session that Rep. Willie Dominguez, DFL-Minneapolis, tried to pass an amendment requiring MnDOT to make a “good faith effort” to reach similar goals during the rebuilding of the 35W bridge.

November 10 Prior Lake High School DFL US Senate Debate Liveblog

November 10th, 2007 5:06 pm by DJ Danielson

4:05 p.m.: Welcome to I Don’t Hate America’s liveblog coverage of the US Senate candidate debate from Prior Lake High School in Savage, MN. Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, Al Franken, and Mike Ciresi have taken their seats. Each candidate will give a five minute opening statement. Each candidate will have three minutes to answer each question with an optional one minute rebuttal. Jim Cohen has just taken his seat. The chair of the DFL in the Second District, Jeanne Thomas, is moderating the debate. There is one microphone, and they will all pass it to one another. Great. Legislators present include Rep. Sandy Mason and Sen. Jim Carlson, both of Eagan.

4:10 p.m.:Nelson-Pallmeyer (wow that is going to get old, so I’ll just refer to him as JNP) is giving his opening statement and reasons for running. He says this administration is the worst in history, which wins applause. He said it isn’t enough to talk about how bad the Bush administration is. He says Jim Hanson from NASA says the decisions made in the next 10 years will affect the quality of life for future generations. JNP criticizes the US’s military spending, which is half of that spent in the world. JNP notes his salary from teaching at St. Thomas went down $4,000 due to changes in his health care plan. JNP says we are robbing from our children and our grandchildren because of our policy choices, which gains applause, even from Franken. JNP advocates single payer health care and elimination of no child left behind. Time of fear and despair can be turned into hope, he says.

Jim Cohen is giving his opening speech. Says hes spent his life advocating at the grass roots level building and leading organizations. He says he has learned over the course of his work is the way to get things done is to listen to people, not polarize. Cohen is standing while giving his speech. Says it is disgraceful that we do not have universal health care, and notes he and JNP are the two who advocate for immediate single payer health care. Cohen would role back the tax cuts for the wealthy and put that toward domestic polices. Says we should get out of Iraq now and redirect the money from war and build jobs. Advocates for employee free choice. Says we can do it, but we can listen to those who’s ideological concerns may differ from us. Is a proud Democrat, but thinks instead of talking about red states and blue states, we should worry about red, white and blue states.

4:16 p.m.:Says we need to cut back on CO2 emissions…now. He is convinced we can do this as “bold, aggressive progressives” but also need to listen and get results. Pleas for attendees to get involved in the caucuses. It should be noted that the DFL central committee earlier today voted to remove the mandatory preference poll for the Senate race. Franken is giving his speech now.

4:20 p.m. Franken introduced his wife Frannie, to applause. Franken speaks of his college tour and says that freshman in Mankato he spoke with were 11 years old when George W. Bush was elected president. They were didn’t know it was possible for a president to be articulate, he says to applause. He notes he visited the turbine at the U of Minnesota Morris and is advocating for “green collar” jobs.

4:25 p.m. Ciresi is now giving his speech and he too introduces his wife, Ann, to applause. Talks about how great the high school we are now in and wishes all students could have a high school this great. I guess he must not have been told about the failure of the referendum. He talks about those who came before him that believed in the American dream which lead to a government that reflected our values. Speaks of the change in the 1960s with the advent of civil rights. Notes he too talked to college students and while they don’t despair they want leadership… that they want leaders who ask “what can we do to make our lives better.” He says affordable, accessible health insurance is a right. Says we should all have education. Notes of students graduating with $100k of debt, a mortgage before even buying a house.

He talks about who he has represented as a lawyer and says he fought to create a level playing field in this state.

4:30 p.m.: The first question is whether the candidates will abide by the endorsement. Cohen says absolutely under all circumstances. Cohen is talking about the ability to be pragmatic and look across the aisle and avoid partisan bickering. He says we have raised the minimum wage to the “miniscule” wage. Calls affordable health care a moral and constitutional right. Says “ABC,” Anybody But Coleman.

4:32 p.m. Franken jokes “I’m going to leave you all in suspense by not answering the question until the end of my three minutes.” He goes on to say he will. He talks about the work he has done for veterans and soldiers, such as using his show to raise money for helmet liners for the Marines as an example of what he has done in his career, probably in response to statements from Ciresi about asking what each candidate has done.

4:35 p.m.: Ciresi says 1.8 million vets don’t have health insurance, four million people if you count their families. Those who have paid the price in this war are those that served and their families, not the wealthy people that can afford it. The common good means everyone of us has the opportunity to reach the full measure of our potential. What is our obligation in this nation to let them reach the potential, he asks. Says we need to make a commitment to take care of each and every veteran. He asks, the day before Veterans Day, that we think about how 25 percent of all homeless are vets.

JNP says it’s important for each candidate to abide by the endorsement so that whoever the candidate is, he has five months to rally and beat Norm Coleman.

4:41 p.m.:The debate was advertised as having 450 seats availiable; probably two thirds of those are full. Next question is about how we get to universal health care. Al Franken says not having universal health care costs us money. WHA ranks America 37th in the world, behind Costa Rica and Slovenia. Franken says he doesn’t think we can get to single payer health care like Cohen and JNP do. Franken thinks that the people who do like their health care will be scared by pharmaceutical companies. He would like to get to single payer health care for all kids because kids don’t cost as much as seniors and this way we can test whether single payer works. He suggests a five year study to see if it works. Like a radio host throwing it to the traffic guy, he “throws it” to Ciresi.

4:44 p.m.: Ciresi advocates for a health care plan similar to those pushed by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Says we should create a national healthcare administration. Says he would pay for it by repealing the Bush tax cuts and closing off-shore tax loopholes. Says we can do it but it takes political will. Says under a Democratic president, we will fix social security then create a universal health care system.

4:47 p.m.:JNP says healthcare is a public good like education. Says we need to have a conversation about what people want from their healthcare. Disagrees with Franken’s position of letting the states have control. He thinks the healthcare system should not be for profit. Says the rich and powerful have insulated themselves from paying their fair share of taxes and says when he is the Junior Senator from Minnesota, the rich and powerful will pay their fair share, which gets a loud cheer.

4:55 p.m.: Cohen wants to eliminate the 37 percent slush fund which is breaking the back of small business. Says we should roll back the tax cuts for the wealthy and focus on preventative medicine and that way we can pay for it now. Says education, fire, police and healthcare are all rights which shouldn’t depend on someone deciding if they can afford them or not. Says a single payer system will be successful if it is a system built on prevention. He says it is time for our leadership to “get where the people are and have the guts and the courage to propose this system now.” Says the HMO’s stock options for their executives are disgraceful while the employee’s pensions are cut.

Franken pats Cohen on the shoulder and says “I’m going to be a pragmatic progressive.” Ciresi says we can’t talk about this in four minutes because of so many variables. Look at the caps on Medicare, he says. Like Franken, he is concerned about those who like the health care they have now. Says value is more important than how many payers there are going to be. JNP says infectious disease is a reason to look for national health care. Says the system now is to not go to the doctor because people have to pay. It’s a built in incentive to not goto the doctor, he calls it. Says a single payer system would not only save money, but save lives. Cohen says we need to be pragmatic, but we need to be leaders too. Why can’t the great United States Of America lead the world to reduce our healthcare costs? Notes there is a bill already in the Congress, HR 676 that will lead us to a single payer system.

5:03 p.m.:Next question is what you would do about no child left behind and what the federal government’s role in education would be. Ciresi says he would eliminate NCLB. He says early childhood education and good nutrition help kids succeed. To applause, he says that we should help districts that are struggling, not take away their funding. “Only the rich deserve education?” he quips. Speaks of the unfunded mandates all the way down from the president, the governor, and to the district. Says education is our backbone and critical.

JNP talks about how he has respect for the public school system, but it is fraying in large part due to NCLB. He supports mainstreaming kids with disabilities, but it needs to be funded, which gets applause. Speaks of how NCLB is punitive. Says NCLB tests have taken the creativity out of teaching and hears complaints from teachers. Speaks of Congress’s appropriation of 57 percent to war and four percent to education. Says if we cut the military budget by ten percent we can fund early childhood education. Says we should not be funding public education with property taxes but rather at the state and federal levels. Says Coleman and Bush have set out to undermine public education as their plan to privatize the common good.

Cohen says NCLB should be done away with immediately. He says the program has good goals but they can’t be met because the federal government hasn’t met its goals, such as funding of special education. Says education is the best form of investment we can make. Says it’s not just bridges falling down, but education falling down. Notes he is a certified teacher and that we should pay them what they deserve. Says we should provide them with the kind of mentoring and development skills to keep them as teachers, as so many of them leave the profession early on. Says we are in the middle of a disaster for our children. Says we should have a tax structure that doesn’t allow the wealthy to have better schools than those in poorer neighborhoods.

5:16 p.m.: Franken says he would scrap NCLB or fully fund it. Talks of her daughter who was a teacher in the Bronx and how unfair the progress testing is. Says early childhood education is important.

Next question is if a candidate supports establishing a Department of Peace. JNP says he does support it but says if the State dept. is functioning how it should be, a Dept. of Peace would not be necessary. Says again we need reductions in military spending to become more secure. Cohen says he supports in principle a program of peace, but isn’t sure it should be cabinet level. Says diplomacy would lead to peace around the world. Thinks a cabinet level agency would be infiltrated by an administration like that of Bush. Says Dept. of Homeland Security is evidence we are running our government via a “politics of fear.” Says we should be having discussions with Iran and Syria, as this would be a program of optimism, not of polarization.

Franken is against a Dept. of Peace. “Imagine a Dept. of Peace under the Bush administration. Richard Pearle would be the secretary.” Says the President of the United States and Depts. of State and Defense should be the “departments of peace” to keep the peace. Says Iraq has shown unilateralism doesn’t work. Says Clinton tried to get peace between Isreal and Palistine. Says Bush missed a chance when Arafat died to get them to work for peace, and it shows how important it is who we elect to be president.

5:25 p.m.: Ciresi says he is not in favor of a department of peace but rather an administration that is peaceful and we should engage in multilateral diplomacy and have an international peace conference concerning the middle east. Points to his reasons why he thinks we have terrorism: the war is a lightning rod, the Israeli/Palestinian issue, and poverty in the middle east.

JNP says the department would ideally promote conflict resolution and domestic issues. Says we shouldn’t jump toward military solutions and points to all of the things we could have accomplished with the money we are spending in Iraq. Franken says what we are really talking about is how we promote peace. Says we should continue the protocol of continuing nuclear non proliferation. Ciresi says we need to look at the world from a geopolitical point of view and see what our role in that is. Says we will have budget deficits until at least 2012 and choices need to be made about how we raise revenue. He says the day of reckoning is coming as far as the debt.

5:33 p.m.:Next question is about if the candidates support a flat tuition rate for all four years of college and if they think tuition and textbooks should be tax deductible. Cohen says rolling back the tax cuts for the wealthy and if we withdraw from Iraq we can afford higher education for all. Thinks that anybody that wants to goto college should have the opportunity to go and it shouldn’t be an issue of affordability. Says flat tuition, or even a descending tuition rate makes sense. Says that we should engage in every tax incentive possible to get our kids through college. Franken says that the number one cost increase of higher education is in the area of health care. Franken says we should increase the amount of Pell grants. Is in favor of ROTC-type programs for teachers and doctors as this would help pinpoint where our priorities are and would encourage people to go into those fields. Wants a GI bill to pay for college for every vet.

Ciresi would not favor regulation on tuition rates on universities. He says the tuition and textbook deductions should be on the table when the tax code is reformed, as he advocates. Supports a 21st century education fund which would bring interest rates down. Wants to reintroduce an element of public service such as giving loan forgiveness to those who go into areas where they are needed such as health care or education.

5:37 p.m.: JNP says his class at St. Olaf was the last class to have a flat tuition and room and board rate for students. Says the key point is to make college affordable for all citizens. Says he is troubled by approaches that involve tax breaks and even lower interest rates. Says the fundamental problem in this country is inequality in wealth. Says our education system reflects that. Wants funded education from preschool to university. Cohen thinks Pell grants should be increased but other things should be looked at to level the playing field. Favors new solutions but didn’t cite anything specifically.

5:48 p.m.:Next question was if the candidates support NASA funding. Franken says he does because it is part of the human experience and helps find frontiers in technology. Says he is concerned about the war on science by the Bush administration which gets applause. Says that intelligent design and being anti-stem cell research scares scientists away from America. Says we should invest in science, not be at war with science. Ciresi also says he supports more funding of NASA but it depends on other priorities. Notes successes in materials and engineering that have come as a result of NASA. Says human nature is such that it always wants to explore the next area and that is space. Says new development is happening in other places in the world but not America, which leads to a lack of good middle class jobs in America. Says we need to face a budget deficit, so funding of NASA may not continue in the same manner.

JNP says he is for funding of NASA that works on renewable energy. Says that much of NASA’s budget is for the purpose of militarization of space. Says the UN voted to keep space for peaceful purposes and the US was the only “nay” vote. Cohen says he supports NASA budget increases in the same ways cited by the other candidates. Agrees with JNP that we need to look at how much is being spent toward militarizing outer space. Calls for corporative relationships with other countries as opposed to America saying “look, we can dominate space.” Nearly every answer is followed by a round of applause.

5:57 p.m.:We are now onto closing statements, starting with Ciresi. He says we need to go back to worrying about the common good. Says we should reach out, join hands and invest in our future. Says the shift toward self interest started with Reagan. Says he has been a leader in Minnesota for 35 years. Refuses to hear a senator say they can not get anything done in their first term.

Franken thanks the crowd for coming. Says the world will breathe a sigh of relief when Bush is gone. He says it isn’t enough to eliminate him, but we must eliminate his friends like Norm Coleman. Says we will have a working majority in the Senate and a greater majority in the House.

Cohen notes there are 362 days until the election. Talks about finding common good, common values and common sense. Says rhetoric is easy. Encourages voters to look at resumes and see who’s been on the ground fighting for average workers, civil rights and the poor. Cohen says it is him. Says we finally have a chance as a party to take the sixth, third and second Congressional districts. Says he will not only be trustworthy but an effective Senator.

JNP says our country is racing like a car 150 mph over a cliff. Says the solution is not to slow down to 100 mph, but to go down a different path. Says we need to face our problems with honesty and with political courage. Says we need a “new new deal” to focus on the health and infrastructure needs of the country. Says the way we defeat Coleman is to offer a compelling vision for where this country can go, not just by talking about how bad the administration is. Says we can move this country forward.

6:02 p.m.: This concludes our coverage of the US Senate debate. Thanks for joining us.

DFL State Central Committee meeting today; will liveblog the DFL Senate debate later today

November 10th, 2007 1:57 pm by DJ Danielson

This post is coming to you live from the DFL State Central Committee meeting in at Prior Lake High School in Savage.

That last part was important because there was some confusion about where the meeting was going to be: some thought it was at the OLD high school (which is now a middle school) and some were initially unable to find it because it was not clear to everyone that the school was in Savage, but it appears everything is smooth sailing.

I will becoming to you later today with a liveblog of the debate between DFL candidates for US Senate.  Mike Ciresi and Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer have been working the crowds; no sign of Al Franken or Jim Cohen yet. Congressional candidates Jim Hovland and Ashwin Madia (Third District) and Steve Sarvi (Second District) have already spoken.

See you all at 4:00 p.m.