Critical element to “gotcha’ politics:” the motion to recommit

October 12th, 2007 3:11 am by DJ Danielson

Welcome to this week’s edition of “Randy Demmer Begs You To Take Him Seriously As a Congressional Candidate” (man, I wish I were podcasting this, that would be fun, maybe I should down the road, hmmm) we follow up on a post at Bluestem about the GOP minority’s struggle to grasp at every little chance of making vulnerable, or potentially vulnerable, Democratic House members look like awful people.

If you ever watch C-SPAN (oh, come on, you know you’re as cool as me!) the tool most convenient for the GOP to accomplish this is the customary “motion to recommit with instructions” put forth immediately before final passage. From today’s “How a Bill Becomes a Law” segment, well, actually C-SPAN’s Congressional Glossary:

A motion to recommit returns a bill to committee, in effect killing it. However, a motion to recommit with instructions is a last opportunity to amend the bill.

The instructions to the committee direct changes to the text of the bill. If adopted, the chairman of the named committee immediately stands and reports the change back to the House. The next step is the House vote on final passage of the bill.

In essence, it’s the purist form of “gotcha’” written within the congressional rules. As many amendments are put forth only for the purpose of being able to put the result of the vote in a direct mailing, not taking into account of the reasons a member is voting against it, the motion to recommit accomplishes the same purpose.

Randy Demmer is already taking full advantage of this as evidenced by his latest mailing to his supporters:

Rochester — “I’m amazed that Tim Walz (MN-01) would vote for the “Death Tax”,” said Randy Demmer, Congressional Candidate for Minnesota 01. “His support of this onerous tax is in direct contrast to the interests of the families, business owners, and farmers he represents. By supporting Nancy Pelosi and voting the Democratic Party line, Walz in effect voted for a $1.35 trillion tax hike.

“Tim Walz’s vote is a serious blow to family owned businesses and farms and their ability to pass their livelihood on to future generations. In casting his vote, Walz showed he is more interested in growing government with increased taxes than he is in helping hard working families. Tim Walz is apparently so committed to raising taxes that he is literally following the American people to their graves,” said Demmer. “Walz is not the supporting the best interest of his constituents by voting to take money from their estates built up by a life time of hard work.”

The motion that Walz voted to kill was offered as part of the Tax Collection Responsibility Act of 2007 (House Roll Call 959). “Walz’s choice was simple. Instead of standing up and fighting for America ’s family businesses, he chose to continue his allegiance to the Democrat leadership by voting against a permanent repeal of the Death Tax.

“Tim Walz is showing that he is out of touch with his constituents by voting to raid the estates of hard-working taxpayers. Walz’s unwillingness to stand up for family-owned businesses and farms is an example of why we must defeat him in November 2008,” stated Demmer. “How much longer can we afford to let Walz and the Democrats raise our taxes and threaten the future of America’s small businesses and farms?”

After reading that, should I ignore the fears of gloom and doom that mailing tried to make me be concerned about, or should I stop laughing? I put forth these challenges to anyone reading this:

  1. Can anyone read this mailing with a straight face? I mean honestly, not smile, chuckle or enter the “full belly laugh” stage which I did?
  2. If you answered “yes” to question “1,” can you honestly think that this press release and the rhetoric presented added anything to the merits of the debate about the issue of the estate tax?

For real now, Randy?: “Tim Walz is apparently so committed to raising taxes that he is literally following the American people to their graves.” I don’t recall rhetoric anywhere close to this loaded and lacking in substance even from Gil Gutknecht. Sorry Randy, but the voters of the First are much too reasonable to accept blabber like that.  Stay in the Minnesota House where Marty Seifert and you can keep playing “gotcha” together.

2 Responses to “Critical element to “gotcha’ politics:” the motion to recommit”

  1. Ollie Ox Says:

    What is it about Randy Demmer that makes me think about Teen Talk Barbie?

  2. I Don’t Hate America! » Blog Archive » More 'gotcha' from the GOP: Carey stretches truth in effort to abush Walz Says:

    […] This isn’t the first time the GOP has used press releases about a “gotcha” vote to try and make Walz appear in poor light: Randy Demmer used loaded rhetoric, eerily similar to that used by Carey, in October to describe a Walz vote on a motion to recommit.  […]

Leave a Reply